Punitives and the Supreme Court
David Sirota has this piece about the importance of Supreme Court nominees outside the hot-button social issues, in particular in the context of the Williams cert grant.
He doesn’t note that Scalia and Thomas dissented in State Farm, which is presumably the position he considers proper. He does mention Scalia in a paragraph asserting potential corruption in the court system.
[via Greedy Trial Lawyer.]
Posted in: